The demise of the artisanal lawyer

In 2014, the University of Oxford published a study on the results of technology on work. Among the more disconcerting findings of the report was the discovery that, on average, 47% of all tasks today are likely to be replaced by computers. The report cited an expanding space between performance and pay, suggesting that normal employees are increasingly unable to keep up with the rate of technological change their skills continuously being made redundant by new computer technologies. More Information can be found on prenuptial agreements.

This is not the very first time the workforce has actually suffered on account of a tectonic shift in technology. The last time this happened was throughout the early days of industrialization, when ratings of experienced artisans were put out of company their handicrafts changed by commercial mass production. Over the long term, the Industrial Revolution benefited both the customers and the producers. While assembly-line production led to the de-skilling of the standard labor force, the mechanization of production ultimately resulted in total reductions in the expense of items that made a bigger variety of products more widely offered.

This time around, it feels as though a lot more blood is going to be spilt. The modifications being wrought by modern-day digital technologies are much more essential and pervasive than anything that has actually come previously. Computer systems are replacing not simply clerical and recurring production tasks, but likewise cognitive and evaluative tasks. Huge data and artificial intelligence algorithms have begun to chip away at abilities long thought to be the exclusive protect of human intelligence. As a result, specialized jobs such as language translation, fraud detection and even cancer treatment diagnostics are being handled (in many cases, more effectively) by computer systems.

I was heartened to observe that on the list of tasks more than likely to be replaced by robots, lawyers are close to the bottom with simply a 3.5% opportunity of being displaced. Exactly what was rather less soothing was that there is a 94% opportunity that paralegals and legal assistants will be replaced by computers. If that happens, it will shake the really structure of business of law.


Law is practiced today in much the same method as it has for centuries. Modern law firms may be big multinational organizations however when you strip away the veneer, even the most sophisticated law firm on the planet is developed around an inherently artisanal structure. At the heart of this structure is the principle that your legal education is refrained from doing up until you have actually successfully completed an apprenticeship. Law practice takes advantage of this by filling the lower ranks of their company with an army of paralegals, students and first-year partners.

These lawyers perform relatively ordinary however crucial jobs of research study and documentation in exchange for the opportunity to sharpen their abilities on live client matters. For its part, the law practice benefits by having actually trained lawyers to carry out easy tasks at a lower expense. This cooperative relationship has existed for years and is fundamental to the method which law firms are organized.

All this will alter once software systems become intelligent sufficient to do the tasks that we have actually so far counted on human students to perform. As artificial intelligence methods make due diligence evaluations and file automation more reliable and practical, there will be no need to deploy first-year partners for these tasks. Which suggests that soon, the on-the-job training model that has actually stood the legal market in great stead for all these centuries will become a distant memory?

A number of company’s market items they claim come with sensible artificial intelligence created to benefit law companies. Last week, at a conference on Innovation in the Law, I saw some of these innovations in action and spoke with some of the worldwide law companies that have actually utilized them.

Then, simply as I was breathing a sigh of relief, I discovered a report of a 19-year-old student who had programmed a chatbot to challenge parking tickets released in London and New York City. At the time the post went to print, the chatbot had actually challenged 160,000 tickets with a 60% success rate. If a teen with little bit more than an Internet connection and standard programs skills can get an operating AI program to do a litigator s job the end of the world can t be that far.

Whitfield native a lawyer rising

Julie Adams Jacobs says she knew really early in life she wished to be a lawyer.

Most likely from the age of 5, certainly by the time I entered school I knew it was what I wished to be, stated the Whitfield County native. I saw a great deal of programs such as Matlock and Perry Mason and chose that was exactly what I wished to do.

Jacobs, a 1996 graduate of Southeast Whitfield High School, was recently named one of 25 attorneys under 40 rising in the state by The Daily Report, a legal paper based in Atlanta.

Among my co-workers really read about it prior to I did, stated Jacobs, who is area chief of business and finance division of the Georgia attorney general of the United States office. She called me and praised me. It was a very enjoyable surprise.


Jacobs said her hubby Chad and her family back in Whitfield County were likewise excited.

I took my husband and my mom with me when they provided the award. I couldn’t have actually achieved what I have without them, she stated.

Jacobs, whose household has actually lived in the Dalton area for more than 100 years, graduated with a degree in government from Georgia State University and a law degree from Emory University.

She was hired by the attorney general of the United States office quickly after graduating from Emory.

I understood I desired to be in the courtroom. I really didn’t understand exactly what I wanted to do when I got out of law school, however I understood I desired to be in the courtroom, she stated. In my very first two years out of law school, I handled 50 cases before the Georgia Supreme Court.

Planning to widen her experience, she switched to business and finance department.

Basically, we work litigation on behalf of the state of Georgia. We defend the state in civil litigation and bankruptcy. We manage any breach-of-contract litigation. We handle procurement litigation, she stated. We handle medical facility acquisitions. The state of Georgia supervises healthcare facility acquisitions and anytime any not-for-profit hospital is offered we go to the neighborhood and I function as the presiding policeman simply making sure not-for-profit assets are safeguarded. I do a little bit of everything. That’s what’s terrific about working here.

Lawyer Lewis Mosho outsmarts Shoprite

Prominent Lusaka lawyer Lewis Mosho has been acquitted by the Lusaka Magistrate Court on charges of theft and money laundering leveled versus him by Shoprite Holdings in 2011.

Mr. Mosho is a senior partner in Lewis Nathan Advocates, a business law practice which worked as Corporate Secretary for Shoprite Checkers.

The judgment brings to an end, a lengthy, acrimonious as well as fractious legal battle spanning over half a decade in between Mr. Mosho and Shoprite.

His remains in a matter where Shoprite South Africa has actually lodged a problem that 2,220,897 of its shares worth US$ 10million where offered on the Lusaka Stock Exchange without the company s authority or consent from the year 2005- 2011.


In a letter dated 21st December 2011 written and signed by DEC Commissioner Mrs. Alita Mbahwe, to Stockbrokers Zambia Ltd, Lewis Nathan Advocates and The Lusaka Stock Exchange, DEC stated that they were examining theft of approximately K50billion (Unrebased) acquired through the sale of Shoprite shares at the Lusaka Stock Exchange.

Shoprite Zambia had actually since kept dividend payments to 20,000 Zambian investors and suspended trade on the LuSE till the theft of K50billion worth of shares and its proceeds is developed.

The transfer legend of shares dates back to the year 2009 when the DEC ignored Mosho’s letter where the lawyer was alerting the commission that Shoprite Checkers had actually instructed him to remit profits totaling up to about K49 billion to a South African agent T. van Tonder without following procedure.

Lusaka High Court Deputy Director Joshua Banda, sitting as Chief Resident Magistrate in Lusaka delivered the judgment on Friday July 1st 2016 and identified that there was no benefit in the case brought against Mr. Mosho.

The court found Mr. Mosho with no case to answer on each of the 43 charges.

And Mr. Mosho states he is just, happy that the reality has actually set me complimentary and this case is now behind us. I can concentrate on business and family now without court matters.

He said his aspiration now is to ensure that he does everything in his power to ensure that foreign financiers comply with regional laws as much as Zambians are anticipated to do in other countries saying there should be no sacred cows.

Shoprite had said that from January 2005 to June 2006, Mr. Mosho breached his responsibility and traded its shares on the Lusaka Stock Exchange without seeking advice from Shoprite Checkers.

The supermarket likewise desired the court to buy a necessary injunction directing LuSE to remedy its records to reflect Shoprite Checker s ownership and title to the treasury.

The judgment also implies Mosho who asserts to have lost millions of dollars during the period his passport and assets were frozen at the request of Shoprite is now at liberty to claim damages, as the law pleases, and as he sees right.

Pin It on Pinterest